Anyone who knows me or reads the blog knows how much I love Apple, Steve Jobs, the drooling fanboys and the products Apple produces. iHoles, the lot of them.
As it turns out, I'm the lone Android tablet user at work. Since I'm kinda responsible for security, the boss thought it would be a good idea for me to take a look. Actually, he thinks he's going to convert me, so I let him believe whatever he wants to. He's the boss, right?
After weeks and weeks and weeks, the unit finally arrived. It appears that Apple refused to sell us a certain model of iPad and we had to wait until there were other models available.
Following several sets of instructions and applying the Guess Method at certain points, I got the device registered. Note that this does not reflect on Apple: this would be the fault of our supplier and us. Naturally there is no one around to ask for assistance.
The first thing I do with any device is poke around the settings. This is where I started getting nervous. From a privacy standpoint, there appears to be an incredible amount of data leakage to Apple, at very least. This was confirmed by one of the fanboys here. When he found out I got an iPad, he suggested I just save the company money and give it back right away because I was going to hate it. Funny, he was the same one who, last week, kept telling me to embrace change and come over to the Dark Side<tm>. He suggested jailbreaking immediately.
My immediate question was how to get data onto the device. Fanboy said there is no way to install music but iTunes. This is not acceptable. My device, my music, my storage. I do not want to ask Steve Jobs' permission every time I want to put music on my tablet. No idea how to put non-music data on- everyone seems to use Dropbox or something similar.
Since email is a rather important item, I went to configure it. Oops, I need a data plan, in spite of the Verizon icon. Again, my company, not Apple. It's most fortunate that we are considering this a test run (because we failed). In fact, the test run has been halted because the vendor messed things up royally.
Back to the unit itself. Let me say some positive things, ok? The battery life far exceeds my android tablet (which isn't fair, as there's something wrong with the android or its battery). It was easy to understand and operate. People don't instantly grok 4-5 finger gestures so it should probably be mentioned somewhere. Personally, I say a lot with a simple one-finger gesture.
I located the market and did some browsing. It sure costs a lot to operate one of these things.. the great majority of android programs are free, including the ones that Apple charges for. Since Apple is known to musicians, I went to that section. There were a ton of guitar magazine apps, a few of which I downloaded free. Each was an invitation to subscribe. Uninstalled. I located a few tv apps, which led to questioning why I can watch episodes of such great shows as Billy the Exterminator and Hoarders on the iPad when I couldn't watch them on my android.
Let's Talk iTunes
I asked around. Apparently it's near impossible to get content to the device without iTunes. Sorry, kids; I will not be held hostage by a large, bloated digital rights management scheme masquerading as a content transfer app. My ever-helpful coworkers pointed out that I could always import my already-purchased music into iTunes and transfer it to the pad.
Why?
Apple has no need to know what content I have, especially the content I did not purchase from them. What a crock of excrement. The privacy leakage is obscene across the entire device and there is very little available in terms of stopping it.
The same helpful coworkers told me they use Dropbox for transfer outside of iTunes. Great... another cloud solution... Another unsafe alternative to keeping content on your own device.
One assistive friend said I `really needed to buy into the entire Apple ecosystem'. That was by far the best quote on the topic.
If I keep the device, I will use one of the apps that functions as transport and media player. Emailing myself docs will have to suffice. Jailbreaking is probably in my future.
Interface
As promised and harped upon, the entire interface is a no-brainer. I found everything and figured out a few things not noted. My wife operated it with no difficulties. My best friend's aging mother has no trouble with it. The only slight niggle is the lack of a locking shift key.
Let's face it: I am not Apple's target customer, even though all of the IT professionals around me seem to have consumed the Kool Aid. There will be no iPhone for me. I'm not even sure how long I'll have the iPad (I prefer the android, thank you).
In Summary
I want to be as fair as possible in this evaluation, especially considering my great love for all things Apple. Aside from small bits of frustration that one would have with any device, the iPad user interface is just fine. The hardware is just fine. It's just the entire Apple experience that drives me up a tree. If you could plug this device into any computer and it would act like a storage device, there would be little to complain about. Apple is downright linux-hostile, which needs to change.
All in all, I prefer the android. It does what it does better, with tons more variety, control and choice available. No surprise there.
tubes, linux, lefty guitar, the anti-social network, sarcasm, chocolate, satire, and chocolate.
Showing posts with label user interface. Show all posts
Showing posts with label user interface. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Windows 8 and Linux
In his column over at Network World, Marco Chiappetta ate some crow over Windows 8. I wanted to salute Marco for being perfectly honest and telling it like it is, however it is. Marco built himself a system and tried Windows 8, in spite of his varying opinion of the operating system.
I read the article with interest. As you probably know, I hate Windows: I'm a linux guy. I am forced to use Windows 7 at work because no one has come up with a way to administer Windows networks under linux.
Windows 7 felt like a downgrade from XP to me. Microsoft has become adept at hiding things from their users. Some would say they're downright fond of it these days. After trying Office 2010, I would have to agree.
Mr. Chiappetta has some really good things to say about Windows 8, specifically in the performance and lack of bloat categories. In fact, I was almost tempted to give it a try.
Until I remembered the interface.
Of all the boneheaded moves for which Microsoft is responsible, this one contains the greatest amount of bone:
No, really, I would try Windows 8 in a virtual machine or a second machine (and I hate Windows). But the interface thing really irks me. I find the sheer hubris of it awe-inspiring, like Apple putting a different connector on their new phone.
Believe it or not, we in Linux Land have had a similar problem recently. What you might find interesting is the way the entire issue was handled, both by the programmers and the users. Something popped up a short while back as an interface for netbooks (remember them?). This was before tablets became all the rage. I downloaded a version of Ubuntu optimized for netbooks with this interface. It lasted a few minutes, after which I replaced it with my normal desktop (XFCE, as in Xubuntu). I saw absolutely no gain from using the all-in-one glob interface.
Flash forward to the here and now, where Ubuntu comes standard with the Unity interface, which is strikingly similar to what I've seen about Windows 8. Unity has caused great amounts of disharmony in Linux Land. My impression is that most don't like it.
Microsoft (and Apple) wish to let you know that if you don't think they know what's better for you than you do, you are cordially invited to perform an anatomically impossible act upon yourself. On the other hand, in Linux Land, you can continue to use the clunky interface or install a different desktop and set it up to your liking.
I would give Microsoft a lot of points for simply including a function to switch between the normal interface and the new one. But Microsoft knows best.
Marco - thanks for the input!
I read the article with interest. As you probably know, I hate Windows: I'm a linux guy. I am forced to use Windows 7 at work because no one has come up with a way to administer Windows networks under linux.
Windows 7 felt like a downgrade from XP to me. Microsoft has become adept at hiding things from their users. Some would say they're downright fond of it these days. After trying Office 2010, I would have to agree.
Mr. Chiappetta has some really good things to say about Windows 8, specifically in the performance and lack of bloat categories. In fact, I was almost tempted to give it a try.
Until I remembered the interface.
Of all the boneheaded moves for which Microsoft is responsible, this one contains the greatest amount of bone:
Hey, let's not only hide every function that is familiar to our entire userbase - let's disguise it behind an interface that is completely worthless on the desktop, not to mention mostly worthless on the tablet!
No, really, I would try Windows 8 in a virtual machine or a second machine (and I hate Windows). But the interface thing really irks me. I find the sheer hubris of it awe-inspiring, like Apple putting a different connector on their new phone.
Believe it or not, we in Linux Land have had a similar problem recently. What you might find interesting is the way the entire issue was handled, both by the programmers and the users. Something popped up a short while back as an interface for netbooks (remember them?). This was before tablets became all the rage. I downloaded a version of Ubuntu optimized for netbooks with this interface. It lasted a few minutes, after which I replaced it with my normal desktop (XFCE, as in Xubuntu). I saw absolutely no gain from using the all-in-one glob interface.
Flash forward to the here and now, where Ubuntu comes standard with the Unity interface, which is strikingly similar to what I've seen about Windows 8. Unity has caused great amounts of disharmony in Linux Land. My impression is that most don't like it.
Microsoft (and Apple) wish to let you know that if you don't think they know what's better for you than you do, you are cordially invited to perform an anatomically impossible act upon yourself. On the other hand, in Linux Land, you can continue to use the clunky interface or install a different desktop and set it up to your liking.
I would give Microsoft a lot of points for simply including a function to switch between the normal interface and the new one. But Microsoft knows best.
Marco - thanks for the input!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)